{"id":4001,"date":"2020-05-17T16:45:14","date_gmt":"2020-05-17T20:45:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.wellspringsuu.org\/new\/?post_type=ctc_sermon&#038;p=4001"},"modified":"2020-11-08T13:36:55","modified_gmt":"2020-11-08T18:36:55","slug":"love-is-an-active-noun-may-17-2020","status":"publish","type":"ctc_sermon","link":"https:\/\/www.wellspringsuu.org\/new\/messages\/love-is-an-active-noun-may-17-2020\/","title":{"rendered":"Love is an Active Noun"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Lay-preacher Chris Groppe shares his first ever message with us. He shares what we can learn about love from Mr. Rogers, a person who taught us what it really means to love all people. He also talks about what a challenging concept that can sometimes be, and shares a meditation which might help us better understand lovingkindness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Love is an Active Noun<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><br>[00:00:09]<br>Very excited to be here with you today. For by first preaching. I have to admit, when I agreed to this date, way back<br>when I never expected to be doing it in this fashion remotely from this tiny little space here in my house. But here<br>we are, Covid 19, the 20 20 edition. And I think the most Cringey part of this situation might be that since it is<br>being done remotely and I&#8217;m filming this a couple of days before Sunday, I will be watching myself on the couch,<br>perhaps when it airs. Maybe I&#8217;ll step away from the computer screen for that point in time. Anyhow, I&#8217;m very happy<br>to be here with you. I&#8217;m going to say up front that my words are my own. They&#8217;re not representative of any<br>organization that I&#8217;m affiliated with. I know that&#8217;s probably unusual to say in these in this setting, but I feel<br>compelled to do that because of my work with the local school district. And I&#8217;m a fan of clear boundaries in these<br>things. So this message series is entitled Love the Hell Out of This World, and it&#8217;s based on the universalist belief<br>that the whole world and everyone in it is worth saving. No exceptions. We talk about our beloved community here<br>at Wellspring&#8217;s and how this beloved community extends beyond our four walls, whether they&#8217;re virtual or real, and<br>really encompasses all of those with whom we come into contact. And it&#8217;s far too easy to see the opposite of this<br>type of love, to see the demagogues who want to divide us into tribal groups who prey upon our fears. Our faith<br>tells us that each of us is beloved, regardless of what you look like, where you come from or even who you vote for.<br>[00:02:06]<br>The core of that belief, though, is a challenge. How do we live out this faith with each other today? Right now. So<br>I&#8217;ve been pondering what it is that drew me to want to preach about this series and what&#8217;s emerged from year two<br>aspects of my life that resonated deeply with universalism. First, my chosen profession in special education. And<br>second, my love for Mr. Rogers. And like many of you, I watched Mr. Rogers growing up and I was lucky enough to<br>have family around me that reinforced his ways of thinking and feeling and caring for others. I don&#8217;t think I<br>realized, though, until later in life how much of his message of I like you just the way you are had sunk so deep<br>inside of me. This was brought home to me when I listen to a podcast series called Finding Fred, hosted by another<br>southwestern P.A. native author, Carvelle Wallace. Mr. Wallace is a best author of The Sixth Man and Other Works<br>and is a lot to like about this podcast. And I highly recommend it might be the first podcast series where I listen to<br>every single episode and the Atlantic magazine named it the best podcast of Twenty Nineteen. So this podcast is a<br>deep examination of the radical compassion presented by Mr.<br>[00:03:25]<br>Rogers neighborhood. The TV show host talks openly in the first episode about exploring why there&#8217;s been a<br>resurgence in interest in Fred Rogers in recent years. And what does this show teach us about being in this world<br>which feels more divided than ever? He interviews writers, comedians, activists, those involved in making the show<br>researchers, people like Angel, Kyoto, Williams, Kamahl Bell, Ashley C. Ford and David Bianculli. Calls Fred Rogers a<br>genius of empathy. There&#8217;s a rich appreciation of how the show helped children understand their feelings. Naming<br>those feelings and helping youngsters recognize that you could have all sorts of different kinds of feelings. And<br>what matters is what you do with those feelings. But he also places the show as being progressive and almost<br>subversive and makes compassionate, makes some connection between Mr. Rogers Christianity and how that<br>shaped his work. For example, he does an in-depth examination of a famous episode involving the character Officer<br>Francois Clemmons. Now, Officer Clemmons is a police officer who is African-American, and Mr. Rogers offers to<br>share a footbath. When Officer Clemmons stops by on his tour of the neighborhood. Now, this is the late 1960s.<br>[00:04:51]<br>So think about how deeply radical and subversive that is for the time. First, simply to pick depicting as normal the<br>existence of a black police officer is noteworthy.<br>[00:05:06]<br>Second, while other communities were barring African-Americans from swimming in pools frequently by whites,<br>here was someone who showed no concern for those practices. Officer Clemmons is making the rounds in the<br>neighborhood. It&#8217;s a hot day. Mr. Rogers is sitting outside his feet in a nice little pool, soaking his feet, and they<br>share this together. And at the end, Mr. Rogers shares his towel with Officer Clemmons. Wallace interviews<br>Clemmons and what that scene meant to him. He stated that there were maybe 10 white people in the country at<br>that time who would have done what Fred Rogers did on that day. But they also discussed the limits of Mr. Rogers<br>subversiveness, pointing out that while Rogers knew that Clemmons was gay on the show, he remained closeted.<br>And how Clemmons makes sense that years later, in the last episode entitled I Like You, as you are there talking<br>about the importance of understanding feelings and the complexity that is love. Who says something like, I thought<br>love was just a stronger version of, like, not just liking somebody, but really, really liking them. So I get that<br>because when you&#8217;re raised on a bunch of bad 80s movies, you can be forgiven for thinking that love means being<br>Lloyd Dobler holding up a boombox for your love until her father comes out to kick you away. Maybe it was teen<br>hormones and angst, or maybe Lloyd Dobler really, really liked her. I don&#8217;t know if it was love. Loving others is a<br>deeper act than this. That&#8217;s what universalism is. Mr. Rogers and the Buddha and maybe others ask us to do. In<br>that last episode, the host distills it down to this. Fred Rogers said that love is an active down like the word<br>struggle. Love is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is to accept ourselves as we are right<br>now.<br>[00:07:16]<br>And that&#8217;s the hard part. Love has nothing to do with liking other people.<br>[00:07:23]<br>So I was running while listening to this podcast. And that sense maybe stop to pause. I wanted to note where it was<br>so I could come back to it. Because this is the part where I was reminded of universalism, our faith asks us to<br>operate on the assumption that we have a love so special. You don&#8217;t have to be special to be loved. We&#8217;re born<br>whole. We&#8217;re born with original blessing. As some say it&#8217;s here. I recognize the connection between universalism<br>and Mister Rogers. Before it was one of those ideas that was maybe a faint path in the woods. But now this is a<br>clear pathway between Mr. Rogers and universalism, regardless of the person he was talking to. He was always<br>showing us a way to listen deeply and fully to them, recognizing their common humanity, signifying the worth of<br>each person. This is hard to do. And in fact, the host and guests on the podcast wrestle with this idea of accepting<br>others as they are while still being troubled by what those people might do or say. They frequently ask, how do you<br>balance this out? How do you make peace with this? How do we explain this to our children? It&#8217;s easy to talk about<br>unconditional love of your child, for example. Well, what of others? What if there is someone whose behaviors or<br>statements are upsetting? How do we see that person? Do we offer them the same type of compassion that we<br>offer our own child? What if they&#8217;ve hurt us over time? Maybe we start to dislike them, dislike the person they have<br>become, perhaps maybe even hate them.<br>[00:09:07]<br>Then we may feel guilt over those feelings. I know I&#8217;ve had these experiences and thoughts, but loving also means<br>accountability, being accountable for your own actions and statements and also being with the other person and<br>loving kindness to help them notice when their behavior is broken. Some boundary. Anyone who&#8217;s raised a child or<br>been around children may recognize this. You might recall a situation in which your child violated some norm.<br>Maybe it was in public and you tell them, you know, I love you, but don&#8217;t ever do that again. And here&#8217;s why it&#8217;s not<br>OK. You still love them, but you have to hold them accountable for their actions so they grow. And this is where I<br>started this sense, that connection with the other aspect of my life that resonated deeply with universalism, my<br>profession and special education. A foundational idea is that all children deserve to be educated to the fullness of<br>their capacity, regardless of ability. And I want to point out, disability covers a very broad range of needs and<br>abilities from students with detention issues to dyslexia to severe cognitive impairments to physical impairments.<br>It&#8217;s a big range. Now I was a special education teacher before becoming a Unitarian Universalist. And what drew me<br>to the field was a desire to help students who struggled in school. Well, there was academic or behavioral when I<br>found myself working with those students. I recognize this was what I was meant to do. People have a lot of<br>different reasons for going into teaching, but I think a necessary one is a love of working with young people. After<br>some years of experience or aging, you realize that you&#8217;ve likely met the full range of humanity and their children,<br>regardless of what kind of school you work in.<br>[00:10:59]<br>So how is this related to the idea of loving even those who are unlikable? I struggle with this. It&#8217;s hard for me to<br>consider a youngster as being unlikable. And I want to respect the experience of students by being choosy as to<br>how or even if I share experiences that I&#8217;ve had over the years. However, if you have kids, you&#8217;re aware they can<br>make some decisions from time to time that are poor decisions. They press your buttons, things of that nature. I<br>started to think about some of the challenging situations I faced even before being where I am now. I thought at<br>the time when one of my students had been convinced by others to say something unlikable and disrespectful to a<br>police officer. He was a student who struggled socially and I don&#8217;t think he recognized the impact his words would<br>have. But what happened was we had to work through that situation with the student, diffuse it and identify what<br>would be an appropriate way to respond. Was the behavior unlikable? Yes. Does the student deserve less love or to<br>be exiled? No, because the challenges in situations arise when our children don&#8217;t yet have the words to name the<br>feelings they&#8217;re experiencing. So they might act out with behaviors. And if you operate on the assumption that all<br>behavior communicates, then you know that they&#8217;re trying to tell you something. They&#8217;re trying to tell themselves<br>something. They&#8217;re trying to make sense out of the situation.<br>[00:12:34]<br>This could be an adult or a child. They still deserve our love. So when I talk with our special education teachers<br>about a student, they might smile and say something like always being a little naughty today. And I know they<br>mean the kid is pushing the boundaries a bit, but they&#8217;re loving him up to get it back on track. And I&#8217;m pretty<br>certain most or not UUs, but in that moment, they&#8217;re feeling that universalist vibe of what it means to be a special<br>education teacher. And this brings it back to the core that our universalist faith has a hefty request of us how to<br>love people when it can be hard to do so, being accountable to them and asking them to be accountable to us and<br>their actions and words while recognizing their worth as another person, despite our differences, despite their tribe<br>or our tribes by who they voted for, who we voted for. Because the easy way out is to push them aside, to demean<br>them, just resign them to some endless other of which we don&#8217;t belong. Universalism. And Mr. Rogers asked us to<br>listen fully, see fully the other person, because we&#8217;re all in this together. So how do we do this? We start with<br>ourselves. I know many of us have some sort of mindfulness or meditation practice. The practice of metta or loving<br>kindness fits well in this need. The idea being that you first provide your own self compassion and then expand it<br>outwards and widen vision to be concentric circles of loving kindness as you meditate.<br>[00:14:16]<br>You can repeat a short phrase, I&#8217;d be safe, I&#8217;d be happy and I&#8217;d be healthy. Mean, I&#8217;d be peaceful entities.<br>[00:14:28]<br>And then you expanded outwards, may all beings be safe, may all beings be happy. May all beings be healthy. May<br>all beings be peaceful. And that is.<br>[00:14:44]<br>So what I&#8217;d like to do today is take a moment to practice this with you right now. Place yourself into a comfortable<br>position straight in your spine and in breath.<br>[00:15:01]<br>And out breath.<br>[00:15:04]<br>If you feel comfortable saying the mantra out loud, do so.<br>[00:15:10]<br>May I be safe. May I be happy. May I be healthy. May I be peaceful and at ease. May I be safe. May I be happy. May<br>I be healthy. May I be peaceful? And at ease.<br>[00:15:33]<br>And then we turn our focus to others, may all beings be safe, may all beings be happy. May all beings be healthy.<br>May all beings be peaceful and at ease. May all beings be safe. May all beings be happy. May all beings be healthy.<br>May all beings be peaceful entities.<br>[00:16:04]<br>And so today, my friends, my wish for you is to have and feel this loving kindness, to see our common, common<br>humanity. That is the core of our universalism.<br>[00:16:17]<br>You live in blessing, Amen. Would you pray with me?<br>[00:16:24]<br>God of our understanding. Let us strive to see the humanity of others as we go about our day to day lives. Let us<br>strive to listen deeply when given the chance. Let us strive to ask skillfull questions so that we may understand<br>even those with whom we disagree or even dislike. Let us know we are all in this together and that the breadth of<br>our human experience is a vast tapestry in which we all have a place for the prayers spoken and the prayers on the<br>hearts of all those listening today. We say amen.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Lay-preacher Chris Groppe shares his first ever message with us. He shares what we can learn about love from Mr. Rogers, a person who taught us what it really means to love all people. He also talks about what a challenging concept that can sometimes be, and shares a meditation which might help us better understand lovingkindness. Love is an Active Noun [00:00:09]Very excited to be here with you today. For by first preaching. I have to admit, when I [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3924,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","ctc_sermon_topic":[147,125],"ctc_sermon_book":[],"ctc_sermon_series":[121],"ctc_sermon_speaker":[128],"ctc_sermon_tag":[],"class_list":["post-4001","ctc_sermon","type-ctc_sermon","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","ctc_sermon_topic-spiritual-practices","ctc_sermon_topic-unitarian-universalism","ctc_sermon_series-love-the-hell-out-of-this-world","ctc_sermon_speaker-chris-groppe","ctfw-has-image"],"featured_image_urls":{"medium":"https:\/\/www.wellspringsuu.org\/new\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/Love-the-Hell-10I-FINAL-1-e1588202467697-300x227.png","thumbnail":"https:\/\/www.wellspringsuu.org\/new\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/Love-the-Hell-10I-FINAL-1-e1588202467697-150x150.png","medium_large":"https:\/\/www.wellspringsuu.org\/new\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/Love-the-Hell-10I-FINAL-1-e1588202467697-768x581.png","post-thumbnail":"https:\/\/www.wellspringsuu.org\/new\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/Love-the-Hell-10I-FINAL-1-e1588202467697-720x480.png","saved-banner":"https:\/\/www.wellspringsuu.org\/new\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/Love-the-Hell-10I-FINAL-1-e1588202467697-1000x400.png","saved-square":"https:\/\/www.wellspringsuu.org\/new\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/Love-the-Hell-10I-FINAL-1-e1588202467697-720x720.png","saved-square-large":"https:\/\/www.wellspringsuu.org\/new\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/Love-the-Hell-10I-FINAL-1-e1588202467697-1024x1024.png","saved-square-small":"https:\/\/www.wellspringsuu.org\/new\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/Love-the-Hell-10I-FINAL-1-e1588202467697-160x160.png","saved-rect-medium":"https:\/\/www.wellspringsuu.org\/new\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/Love-the-Hell-10I-FINAL-1-e1588202467697-480x320.png","saved-rect-small":"https:\/\/www.wellspringsuu.org\/new\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/Love-the-Hell-10I-FINAL-1-e1588202467697-200x133.png"},"appp_media":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wellspringsuu.org\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ctc_sermon\/4001","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wellspringsuu.org\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ctc_sermon"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wellspringsuu.org\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/ctc_sermon"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellspringsuu.org\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellspringsuu.org\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4001"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellspringsuu.org\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ctc_sermon\/4001\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4225,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellspringsuu.org\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ctc_sermon\/4001\/revisions\/4225"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellspringsuu.org\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3924"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wellspringsuu.org\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4001"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"ctc_sermon_topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellspringsuu.org\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ctc_sermon_topic?post=4001"},{"taxonomy":"ctc_sermon_book","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellspringsuu.org\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ctc_sermon_book?post=4001"},{"taxonomy":"ctc_sermon_series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellspringsuu.org\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ctc_sermon_series?post=4001"},{"taxonomy":"ctc_sermon_speaker","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellspringsuu.org\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ctc_sermon_speaker?post=4001"},{"taxonomy":"ctc_sermon_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellspringsuu.org\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ctc_sermon_tag?post=4001"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}